A Crisis Of Intelligence

hannu-keski-hakuni-vgxIfXwsUAE-unsplash.jpg

Good Morning,
 

Stocks fell on Friday, led by major tech shares, as Wall Street wrapped up a difficult week in which coronavirus cases rose, U.S. fiscal stimulus talks broke down and traders braced for next week’s presidential election.

The Dow and S&P 500 fell 6.5% and 5.6%, respectively, and posted their biggest weekly losses since March. The Nasdaq lost more than 5% over that time period and also had its worst one-week performance since March.


Those weekly losses came as the seven-day average of new coronavirus cases in the U.S. hit an all-time high this week, according to data from Johns Hopkins University. In Europe, Germany, France and the UK announced new lockdown measures to curb the virus’ spread.

Our Take


Massive policy stimulus, positive medical developments, a belief that lockdowns were discredited and high hopes for a return to pre-pandemic economic activity levels have provided solid support for equity markets yet with each passing day, they each seem to be on increasingly shaky ground. Stimulus is now likely stalled until the new year, new economic restrictions in the form of lockdowns, particularly in Europe, in response to the re-acceleration in COVID-19 infections, are now catching investors attention triggering a re-evaluation of downside risk. 

Investors had been betting on both sides reaching a stimulus deal before Tuesday’s vote and now recent data is suggesting that the recovery may continue to lose momentum without new aid just as governments face pressure to re-lockdown. 

On a more positive note, we are now halfway through a spectacular third-quarter earnings season. So far, 85% of companies have beat expectations by an astounding 19% on average, well above the historic average of 3% to 5%, according to The Earnings Scout.

But the market has shrugged. The S&P 500 is 8% below where it started on the day earnings season began Oct. 13.
 

Why? It’s simple: markets don’t live on past earnings reports, however good they may be. They live on future earnings projections, and they are now in danger of plummeting. Markets are being hit with a quadruple whammy: The reopening narrative is in trouble, with politicians opting for fresh lockdowns despite clear evidence of their disastrous economic effects; stocks are richly priced, even for an economic recovery; strong earnings reports are not moving stocks up; and some CEOs are again, declining to provide guidance, leaving analysts to themselves.

The reopening story is in jeopardy. Investors were betting that the reopening would continue to proceed without lockdowns, and that additional stimulus would be coming to bridge the gap to a vaccine that would be widely available sometime in the second quarter. In other words, investors priced in rational political leadership that was data driven and awake to the long term economic and social health of their nations. 

Then Europe happened. Germany, France and the UK decided to re-lockdown, closing bars and restaurants for at least a month. More lockdowns, more of the same failed policies, instead of learning from our failures and the successes of other eastern nations. The strategies pursued by South Korea, Vietnam, China and others do still seem to be paying off. While the total Covid-19 death toll is between 500-700 per million people in France, the U.K., Spain and the U.S., in China and South Korea it is below 10 per million. 

If the key to avoiding more lockdowns is finding a way to “live with the virus” — through widespread testing, investment in health infrastructure, protecting the vulnerable, tracing of contacts and isolating positive cases to slow transmission — Western countries have made structural, not cultural, errors.


The problem is that even if outright lockdowns do not happen in the U.S., a widespread slowdown in economic activity — with many simply refusing to go out regardless of whether stores and restaurants are open or not — is increasingly likely given the following reality:

Screen Shot 2020-10-31 at 9.05.16 PM.png

Third-quarter numbers have been great, but Wall Street had been betting that the following three quarters (Q4, Q1, and Q2) will also see sequential improvement as the reopening story proceeds. The lockdown story likely kills all of this and companies know it as many have declined to provide guidance to analysts. 

The prospects of renewed economic slowing, if not the outright onset of a new recessionary phase in 2020 Q4 and 2021 Q1, due to lockdowns would also likely result in meaningful downward revisions to corporate earnings forecasts that were until recently getting revised marginally higher but remain depressed below pre-COVID levels.

If politicians choose to go down this road, U.S. stocks are likely set up for meaningful disappointment as these earnings forecasts increasingly fall apart. Will investors want to own stocks at 60 times or 80 times earnings, if not more?

Put this ugly package together, and you have a high degree of macro uncertainty, with stimulus doubts, lockdown threats, uncertainty on the timing of the vaccine, and the election.

It’s a potentially explosive combination that on its face, appears to be a nightmare for investors. On top of such worries you have hedge fund gurus lining up to call a top as well as calling for “a lost decade” for stocks. 
 

So what to do in the face of the above? 

Musings

We do believe that the current climate does represent accumulating potential downside risk, yet we prefer to remain cautiously optimistic and focus on “what is” rather than “what if”. 

Leadership in the west is abysmal yet we are not surprised. Leadership is simply a reflection of those who elect such leaders and studies show that people in the West are getting “dumber” by the year. 

A recent study found that 19 percent of young New Yorkers — millennials and Gen Z — believe Jews caused the Holocaust. A shocking 58 percent of New York state adults between 18 and 39 could not cite the name of any concentration camp, death camp or ghetto. 

A survey in 2013 by the Public Religion Research Institute found that 27 percent of Americans think God helps determine the outcome of football games. A 2012 survey by the National Science Foundation found that 26 percent of Americans believe the sun goes around the Earth instead of the other way around, which indicates people haven’t been keeping up with the newspapers since about 1532. As for Democrats, 67 percent of them said (in a 2018 YouGov poll) that Russia “tampered with vote tallies in order to get Donald Trump elected.” There is no more evidence for this than there is for the existence of vampires. A survey last year found that the majority of residents in every state except Vermont would have failed a citizenship test. 

In another recent study it was found that the IQ scores of young men have plunged below previous generations for the first time in nearly a century. For the past 90 years, the IQ levels of young people were believed to have steadily increased by about three points per generation in a phenomenon dubbed the Flynn effect. But the selfie generation’s empty-headedness may be linked to the way math and language are now taught — along with more time spent on TV and cell phones/computers researchers said. This is the most convincing evidence yet of a reversal of the Flynn effect. 

Given the above, should we really be surprised by the intellectually vacuous debates we’ve witnessed in the run up to November 4? Should it shock us that politicians aren't learning and improving their responses to the pandemic? 

We are facing nothing short of an intelligence crisis in the West from the bottom right up to the top, which is undermining our problem-solving capacities and leaving us ill-equipped to tackle the complex challenges posed by pandemics, AI, global warming and developments we have yet to imagine.

Investors should be aware of these shortcomings (think of it as a cognitive decline risk or ignorance risk) and take them into consideration as they price risk and make decisions as to where and with whom they will allocate capital. 

So what to do? If technology and complex challenges are on the rise while IQ is on the decline, we believe that the best opportunities for long-term growth and capital appreciation will be found in disruptive innovation. We believe such opportunities have the ability over time to transcend cognitive decline risk/ignorance risk. 

And they have. In a recent piece in Bloomberg, Sarah Ponczek found that if you took all the physical assets owned by all the companies in the S&P 500, all the cars and office buildings and factories and merchandise, then sold them all at cost in one giant sale, and they would generate a net sum that doesn’t even come out to 20% of the index’s $28 trillion value. Much of what’s left comes from things you can’t see or count: algorithms and brands and lists. This is, in the broadest sense, a new phenomenon. Intangible assets make up more than 84% of S&P 500 firm value. 

So, for all the stress and worry about how the pandemic run-up in tech stocks bespeaks a bubble that’s bound to burst, what if the bigger concern is that it doesn’t?

Screen Shot 2020-10-31 at 12.49.19 PM.png

If you work at a company riding this wave or better yet own one, you’re doing well. For everyone else, the news is less good. One loose way of thinking of the impact is that while intellectual property tends to create a small set of well-to-do workers and investors, it often displaces a larger set of non-innovation focused ones. 

This helps explain why many American workers have recently had it so rough, with wages stagnating and benefits disappearing. Demand for certain intangible linked skills is rising while it is dropping for almost every other skill set. 

The market’s appetite for earnings based not on plants and machinery, but ideas -- feeds itself. The share of business investment targeted at intangible assets is now rising 1 1/2-times faster than it did during the financial crisis, itself a record period of hyper-investment in intangibles, estimates Jason Thomas, the head of global research at Carlyle Group.

Such spending tends to be motivated by a desire to do more with less. Our bet is that this continues. Unfortunately, if it does, it implies an uncomfortable projection for a labor market still destroyed from the shutdowns, with close to 8% of people in the U.S. unemployed and the prospect of further shutdowns looming. 

In fact, the Covid-19 induced economic shutdowns should be thought of as the worst assault on the working class in half a century. Economic recoveries that focus more on intangible investments have increasingly been met with slower labor market bounce-backs and this rebound will be no different. 

Innovative ideas are becoming more hard to come by and thus, we believe that big idea-based companies - those who are the leaders, enablers, and beneficiaries of disruptive innovation - will be the epicentre of attractive future returns. 

Despite lockdowns, the absence of a vaccine, the presence of a Republican or Democrat in the White House, cognitive decline in the West, we are confident that remaining long big ideas will reward the patient long-term investor. 

 
Charts of the Month

Screen Shot 2020-10-31 at 6.45.12 PM.png
Screen Shot 2020-10-31 at 6.53.42 PM.png
Screen Shot 2020-10-31 at 7.40.16 PM.png

The number of business bankruptcies and insolvencies in most countries has declined this year through the coronavirus pandemic as the world is seeing far fewer bankruptcies than it did in 2019. But that is largely thanks to assistance from central banks and government measures restricting things like foreclosures.

What it means: When the smoke clears the world is likely to be looking at a sizable increase in the number of zombie companies — firms that owe more on debt than they generate in profits but are kept alive by relentless borrowing.

Why it matters: "Zombie firms are smaller, less productive, more leveraged and invest less in physical and intangible capital," the Bank for International Settlements concluded in a report last month.

  • "Their performance deteriorates several years before zombification and remains significantly poorer than that of non-zombie firms in subsequent years."

In other words: More zombies will lead to a slower, less efficient and less productive global economy.

Logos LP September  2020 Performance


September 2020 Return: 0.76%
 

2020 YTD (September) Return: 51.51%
 

Trailing Twelve Month Return: 67.44%
 

Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) since inception March 26, 2014: +21.31%


 

Thought of the Month

"Where there is no vision, the people perish." —Proverbs 29:18



Articles and Ideas of Interest

  • The role of luck in life success is far greater than we realized. Are the most successful people in society just the luckiest people? The importance of the hidden dimension of luck raises an intriguing question: Are the most successful people mostly just the luckiest people in our society? If this were even a little bit true, then this would have some significant implications for how we distribute limited resources, and for the potential for the rich and successful to actually benefit society (versus benefiting themselves by getting even more rich and successful). Fascinating article in the Scientific American

  • Researchers gave thousands of dollars to homeless people. The results defied stereotypesResearchers gave 50 recently homeless people a lump sum of 7,500 Canadian dollars (nearly $5,700). They followed the cash recipients' life over 12-18 months and compared their outcomes to that of a control group who didn't receive the payment.

  • Trump boasts the economy reached historic heights during his first term. Here are 9 charts showing how it stacks up to the Obama and Bush presidencies.

     

  • Biden, Democratic victories would be the best outcome for the economy, Moody’s says. Biden would be allowed to enact more wide-sweeping economic policy changes such as spending trillions on infrastructure, education and social safety, while also boosting trade and immigration. “Greater government spending adds directly to [GDP] and jobs,” Zandi said, while also arguing that the higher taxes Biden has proposed to fund some of these plans have an “indirect impact” and would not slow the economy. Moody’s analysis found that a Trump victory would be a worse outcome for the economy because of his smaller proposals for fiscal stimulus and the increased likelihood of deeper trade tensions and cuts to immigration. Trump has proposed “much less expansive support to the economy from tax and spending policies,” Moody’s said, adding that his planned immigration cuts are a “significant impediment to longer-term economic growth” as it slows both the job market growth and labor productivity.

  • Either way, on Nov. 3, China wins. Mary Hui and Jane Li explain why Beijing is in an “enviable position” going into this US presidential election. A Joe Biden administration would likely bring some cooperation and less confrontation while a Donald Trump win might mean more short-term pain, but would also reduce America’s ability to overcome internal divisions and forge a global strategy to counter China.

  • Shallower pools, emptier pockets. Back in June, Donald Trump temporarily halted the H-1B visa program, which companies use to recruit highly skilled foreign workers, especially in computer science. Ananya Bhattacharya lays out how shutting 200,000 top employees out of the country shaved $100 billion off of Fortune 500 companies’ returns.

  • The loneliness of the long-distance employee. It takes effort to maintain camaraderie while working from home. The Great Work From Home Experiment of 2020 has gone on for nearly eight months, and preliminary results are coming in. Overall, surveys suggest that most of us like it most of the time, except for one thing: We feel lonely. “Camaraderie” is the No. 1 thing people look forward to about an eventual return to the office. “Loneliness” is often at the top of the list of downsides to remote work.

  • The GOP’s demographic doom. Millennials and Gen Z are only a few years away from dominating the electorate. Given that the younger generations align much more closely with Democratic ideological views on almost all policy questions, this shift underscores the stakes in the generational roulette Trump has played by defining the GOP so narrowly around the priorities and preferences of his core groups: older, nonurban, non-college-educated, and evangelical white people. If Democrats can not only express the values of younger Americans, but also advance their material interests, they will have a substantial advantage in building electoral majorities through the decade ahead, says Ruy Teixeira, a veteran Democratic election analyst and co-founder of the States of Change project, which is a joint research collaboration between three liberal-leaning groups and the centrist Bipartisan Policy Center.

  • Stocks typically climb, regardless of who’s in the White House. For investors worried about how the stock market will fare in the event of a divided government or a sweep by either party in next month’s elections, history offers an important lesson.  

     

  • Machines to 'do half of all work tasks by 2025'. Millions more jobs will be lost to robots with Covid accelerating the trend, says the World Economic Forum.

  • How do pandemics end? In different ways, but it’s never quick and never neat. Just like the Black Death, influenza and smallpox, Covid-19 will affect almost every aspect of our of lives – even after a vaccine turns up.

  • Psyche, an asteroid believed to be worth $10,000 quadrillion, is observed through Hubble Telescope in new study. The exact composition of Psyche is still unclear, but scientists think it's possible the asteroid is mostly made of iron and nickel. It's been hypothesized that a piece of iron of its size could be worth about $10,000 quadrillion, more than the entire economy on our planet. LOL “Wealth” is such a relative concept...

  • Now that more Americans can work from anywhere, many are planning to move away. An astonishing 14 million to 23 million Americans intend to relocate to a different city or region as a result of telework, according to a new study released by Upwork, a freelancing platform. The survey was conducted Oct. 1 to 15 among 20,490 Americans 18 and over. The large migration is motivated by people no longer confined to the city where their job is located. The pandemic has shifted many companies' view on working from home. Facebook announced plans for half of its employees to work from home permanently. The company even hired a director of remote work in September to ease the transition. Big cities will see the largest outmigration, according to the survey. Meanwhile, Bruce Flatt the CEO of Brookfield believes things will go right back to normal. With COVID-19 cases reaching new records in the U.S. and spiking around the world, Flatt’s confidence in a return to pre-pandemic norms stands out, and it may be wishful thinking...

    Our best wishes for a month filled with discovery and contentment,

    Logos LP

Everything is F*cked But Hope Springs Eternal

volodymyr-hryshchenko-7JAyy7jLTAk-unsplash.jpg

Good Morning,
 

U.S. stocks rose on Friday, recovering some of their losses for the week, as tech shares clawed back some of their big September declines. Nevertheless, despite Friday’s rally both the Dow and S&P 500 posted four-week losing streaks, their longest slides since August 2019.

 

The major averages have had a tough month, with the S&P 500 falling 5.8% in September. The Dow has dropped 4.4% over that time period and the Nasdaq is down 7.3% month to date.


Our Take


It is important to remember that there are always two ways to view the stock market at any given time. From an optimistic perspective, there is the potential for favorable results from the Phase III clinical trials as early as the end of October, the elections could be decided in an orderly manner, large institutions and investors could put their record cash piles to work, earnings growth could take off as governments and central bankers continue to support the economy and holiday shopping could be impressive with limited disruption from COVID-19.

 

From a pessimistic perspective, one could say that all of those developments above are unlikely. No vaccine at all, the election results could be delayed and contested thus resulting in complete turmoil, as a second wave of COVID-19 prompts further economic shutdowns leading to economic collapse.

 

Whatever camp you fall into, it is important not to get swallowed by emotion as the reality will likely lay somewhere in between. 

 

Absent additional full economic shutdowns by governments in response to a second wave of COVID-19 (if this happens again all bets are off as the damage would likely be irreversible) we believe the recovery will continue albeit extraordinarily unevenly across industries and countries.  


The Economist recently revisited their “90% economy” prediction and found that economies certainly have begun to recover, yet the world is still a long way from normal. Governments continue to enforce social-distancing measures to keep the virus at bay. These reduce output—by allowing fewer diners in restaurants at a time, say, or banning spectators from sports arenas. People remain nervous about being infected. Economic uncertainty among both consumers and firms is near record highs—and this very probably explains companies’ reluctance to invest.

Screen Shot 2020-09-27 at 10.02.58 AM.png

Calculations by Goldman Sachssuggest that social-distancing measures continue to reduce global GDP by 7-8% and such measures are set to continue in most countries. Yet The Economist found that although the global economy is operating at about nine-tenths capacity, there is a lot of variation between industries and countries. Some are doing relatively—and surprisingly—well, others dreadfully.

 

When considering the respective performance of goods and services, goods have bounced back fast while services activity is a lot further below its pre-pandemic level. This is understandable as services require person to person interaction and thus when confidence is lacking, consumption of services wanes. 

 

Additionally, the magazine found that the huge gap between countries’ economic recovery can be attributed to: 1) industrial composition (countries which rely on retail and hospitality and laggards) 2) confidence (countries who had good leadership under lockdown) and 3) stimulus (countries that put in place large rescue package ie. America may still not be able to agree on a new one, yet still has ALREADY enacted the world’s largest package relative to the size of its economy). 

Screen Shot 2020-09-27 at 10.03.48 AM.png

In light of the above, and the fact that most developed countries seem to be hovering around a “90% economy”, should we opt for the pessimistic view of markets or the optimistic view? 

 

In our view, absent further draconian lockdowns, we believe that a 90% economy - one which could trend towards 95% if countries can better calibrate social-distancing measures without jeopardizing output - is certainly not a good enough reason for the patient long-term investor to significantly reduce equity exposure and move to cash or gold.


There will be scars to the economy and the recovery will take time, there will be more short term volatility in markets as political headlines and a record amount of derivatives trading foster instability, yet we remain hopeful and confident that holding quality businesses with unique secular tailwinds for the long-term, remains the right strategy.



Membership to Exclusive Daily Newsletter



We have launched an exclusive daily newsletter including actionable daily insights for DIY investors from Logos LP

  • Each Digest Contains the Following:

    • Key Market Technicals

    • Logos LP Watchlist 

    • Macro News

    • Logos LP Update

    • Alerts

Membership will initially be limited to 1000 members. Please subscribe here.


Musings
 

Over the course of the month of September it has struck me how emotional the last 6 months have been for most. How difficult it has been to wake up 6 months into the pandemic and read a variety of news headlines which are basically the same as those featured 5 months ago, 4 months ago 3 months ago etc.: 

 

-“Terrified’: Bar, restaurant, gym owners say they won’t make it if forced to close again”

-”New-York State Tops 1,000 New Daily Coronavirus Cases for First Time Since Early June”

-”Stock market crash: David Rosenberg warns of a dot-com-bubble, IPO mania”

-”The Death of the American Dream” 

 

The mood is sombre. Hope appears to be slipping away as pandemic fatigue sets in and this is precisely what we as a society need to combat: hopelessness. 

 

Flirting which such feelings myself over the last six months, I picked up a book this month with a title that unsurprisingly caught my attention: “Everything is Fucked: A Book About Hope” by Mark Manson (ironically written pre-Covid-19) 

 

While the book covers a lot of ground, what resonated with me was his explanation that “the human psyche needs hope to survive the way a fish needs water.”

 

He furthers that: 

 

Hope is the fuel for our mental engine. It’s the butter on our biscuit. It’s a lot of cheesy metaphors. Without hope, your whole mental apparatus will stall out or starve. If we don’t believe there’s any hope that the future will be better than the present, that our lives will improve in some way, then we spiritually die. After all, if there’s no hope of things ever being better, then why live- why do anything?” 

 

Without hope for the future one sinks into indifference and nihilism- the sense that there is no point, no broader “why?”. Without hope for the future, without a hope narrative that gives us a sense of purpose, we pursue the pure indulgence of desire. Success for the sake of success. Pleasure for the sake of pleasure. Power for the sake of power. Protest for the sake of protests. Shut downs for the sake of shut downs. Hysteria for the sake of hysteria. 

 

Manson reminds us that, hopelessness is the root of anxiety, mental illness and depression. It is the source of all misery and the cause of all addiction. Chronic anxiety is a crisis of hope. It is the fear of a failed future. Depression is a crisis of hope. It is the belief in a meaningless future. Should we be surprised that such mental illnesses are on an eighty year upswing among young people and a twenty year upswing among the adult population? 

 

The problem with COVID-19 six months in, is that it has exacerbated the crisis of hope which was plaguing the rich developed world well before the pandemic struck. Although a serious public health issue, we now have nothing short of a COVID-19 national hysteria. We’ve allowed the virus to take over our economy, our small businesses, our schools, our social lives, our quality of life and most importantly our hope for the future. 

 

This irrational sense of hopelessness is growing and those in power should carefully consider its effects when they set out to combat a second wave of COVID-19 and put policies in place to aid in the recovery. 

 

The human mind/human nature is the most powerful force on earth. Left misunderstood by those in power as well as by those acutely suffering from a lack of hope themselves, any recovery will be challenged. 

 

The rich developed world has made incredible progress in health, safety, material wealth and quality of life yet those are facts about the past, not the future. Hope doesn’t care about these things. Hope only cares about the problems that still need to be solved. Hope must be found in our visions for the future. 

 

We as individuals and as a society need to find our “why” again. Our personal hope narratives which give us a reason to believe that our tomorrows will be better than our todays. Our inspirational vision which gives us purpose. Which makes us smile, grounds us, helps us stay on course, joyful in the face of adversity and suffering.  

 

Somewhere along the way as we argue about whether everything is “rigged”, or whether we will “accept” to leave office, or what we are entitled to by virtue of our birth, or about how much we wish to take from others who have earned it to give to ourselves, or as we continue to surrender our economies and our lives to the virus, we’ve become lost. 

 

My hope is that we succeed in finding hope again. That will be the true recovery. 

Charts of the Month

Screen Shot 2020-09-27 at 10.53.28 AM.png

Where is hope trending? 

Screen Shot 2020-09-27 at 9.59.29 AM.png
Screen Shot 2020-09-27 at 10.00.17 AM.png
Survival.COVID.JPG

In Canada, the Covid-19 mortality rate is 0.024% and the chance of not dying from Covid-19 is 99.975% yet in a survey conducted on behalf of Global News, Ipsos found that 75% of respondents would approve of quickly shutting down non-essential businesses in the event of a second wave???

Why isn’t the media talking about this? That’s also what TIS Group asks in the USA, citing revised Centers for Disease Control statistics that say Covid-19 is only directly responsible for 6% of the reported Covid deaths in the U.S., or around 10-11,000 people. The rest of deaths reflect Covid as a contributing factor to existing illnesses, particularly among the elderly...

Balance Sheets.PNG
Debt.PNG
STEM.PNG
Judge.png
Judge.2.png

Logos LP August  2020 Performance

 


August 2020 Return: -0.71%
 

2020 YTD (August) Return: 50.36%
 

Trailing Twelve Month Return: 57.65%
 

Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) since inception March 26, 2014: +21.46%


 

Thought of the Month


 

"Fearlessness is not the absence of fear, but the willingness to walk into it. When I walk into my fear, practice there, sit upright in the middle of it, completely open to the experience, with no expectation of the outcome. Anything is possible. When our circumstances look impossible or terrifying, there is a way. -Judith Randall




Articles and Ideas of Interest

 

  • Interactive Brokers braces for election volatility by telling clients to put up more cash. Market action around the election is expected to be so volatile that Interactive Brokers is forcing clients to put up more money in order to trade using leverage. The retail broker is increasing margin requirements — how much money an investor using leverage and derivatives has in their brokerage account after a stock purchase — heading into the November presidential election, according to a clients letter obtained by CNBC.

  • Is Covid to blame for business closures or is it helping new startups? The answer may be both. A report found that more than 100,000 restaurants have closed this year, but another says new business applications are up by 19%. Everyone has their narrative about the plight of small business because it’s a political issue. The right wants to make it out that small businesses are suffering and state governments need to relax the shutdowns. The left says that not only small businesses, but their employees, are feeling pain and therefore significant stimulus is still needed. Both sides agree on some form of a more targeted round of the Paycheck Protection Program. Everyone’s right. Everyone’s wrong. The fact is that no one really knows for sure about the effects Covid has had on small businesses ... yet. We won’t know until this whole thing is over and researchers can comb through the data and that’s going to take a few years. I’m sure they’ll find that many businesses did close permanently because of the pandemic. But then again, how many of these businesses would have closed anyway? And how many were previously buoyed by a strong economy until that facade disappeared?

  • America divided by education. The gulf between the party identification of white voters with college degrees and those without is growing rapidly. Trump is widening it. One of the most striking patterns in yesterday’s election was years in the making: a major partisan divide between white voters with a college degree and those without one. According to exit polls, 61 percent of non-college-educated white voters cast their ballots for Republicans while just 45 percent of college-educated white voters did so. Meanwhile 53 percent of college-educated white voters cast their votes for Democrats compared with 37 percent of those without a degree. The diploma divide, as it’s often called, is not occurring across the electorate; it is primarily a phenomenon among white voters. It’s an unprecedented divide, and is in fact a complete departure from the diploma divide of the past. Non-college-educated white voters used to solidly belong to Democrats, and college-educated white voters to Republicans.


     

  • Covid grows less deadly as doctors gain practice, drugs improve. For those who develop dangerous cases of the infection, advances in medical care and the growing experience of doctors are improving the chances of survival. Since the first case arrived in the U.S. at the start of the year, medical professionals have gone from fumbling in the dark to better understanding which drugs work -- such as steroids and blood thinners, and the antiviral medicine remdesivir. Allocation of intensive medical resources have improved. And doctors have learned to hold off on the use of ventilators for some patients, unlike with many other severe respiratory illnesses. Governments are also learning lessons from Europe’s lockdowns and finding that they simply can’t lock down again.

  • Why we shouldn’t have unrealistic expectations regarding COVID-19 vaccines. Among pharmaceutical, medicinal and drug products, vaccines are by far the most complex. They are also life-saving. In times of devastating disease outbreaks such as the COVID-19 pandemic, it is not uncommon to foster hopes that an effective vaccine, a magic bullet, could somehow be quickly made and administered to people. Unfortunately, reality can be very different because vaccines can take a long time to be developed (4-5 years typically), longer than most pharmaceutical, medicinal or drug products. Bottom line: there may never be a magic bullet. We need to get better living with the virus. Furthermore trust in Covid-19 vaccines could turn on a knife edge. The race to remove regulatory and legal roadblocks to secure a vaccine could blow the whole vaccine hope wide open. Will you line up to take a vaccine which has been rushed through development without large scale patient trials from a vaccine maker that has been given full legal immunity from personal injury lawsuits?

  • 52% of young adults are living with their parents. That's higher than any prior measure on record, even surpassing the Great Depression's peak. Millennials will likely continue to pay the price for their parents’ luck and self-indulgence. According to a new report by Deutsche Bank the consequences of this dynamic will be so severe this widening generational divide should be a key source of alarm for investors, financial markets and society as a whole. “Investors can expect an abrupt, and significant upheaval in housing and asset markets, tax systems, climate policy, and many other areas,” Allen wrote. “This scenario becomes more likely towards the end of this decade as Millennial and younger voters start to exceed those in older generations.” (This year millennials have surpassed baby boomers as the country’s largest adult population.)

  • How China is preparing its economy for a future where the U.S. isn’t the center of global demand. In a world rocked by the coronavirus pandemic and tensions with the U.S., the Chinese government is stepping up focus on the domestic market with the pronouncement of a “dual circulation” policy. Increased public discussion in the last few weeks has helped crystallize some of the implications for global trade. “The ‘dual circulation’ policy demonstrates China’s recognition that it won’t be able to rely on trade as much for the next two decades, as it did for the previous two,” Stephen Olson, research fellow at the nonprofit Hinrich Foundation, said in an email this week. China is focused squarely on a post U.S.centric world in which China leads in technology innovation

  • Remote work is killing the hidden trillion dollar office economy. From airlines to Starbucks, a massive part of our economy hinges on white-collar workers returning to the office. As companies in cities across the U.S. postpone and even scrap plans to reopen their offices, they have transformed once-teeming city business districts into commercial ghost towns comprised of essentially vacant skyscrapers and upscale complexes. A result has been the paralysis of the rarely remarked-upon business ecosystem centering on white-collar workers, who, when you include the enterprises reliant on them, account for a pre-pandemic labor force approaching 100 million workers. 

  • Japanese doctor who lived to 105-his spartan diet, views on retirement, and other rare longevity tips1) Don’t retire. But if you must, do so a lot later than age 65, 2) Take the stairs (and keep your weight in check). 3) Find a purpose that keeps you busy. 4) Rules are stressful; try to relax them. 5) Remember that doctors can’t cure everything. 6) Find inspiration, joy and peace in art.

Our best wishes for a month filled with discovery and contentment,

Logos LP

Laugh Now Cry Later

Image Source: From Drake's Laugh Now Cry Later music video, 2020.Courtesy of UMG / Republic / OVO

Image Source: From Drake's Laugh Now Cry Later music video, 2020.Courtesy of UMG / Republic / OVO

Good Morning,
 

Stocks rose on Friday, lifted by strong U.S. economic data, to end a week that saw the broader market reach a record level. 

 

The bull market was strong before the virus and it has now regained its stride. This week's price action confirmed that. A 55% move off the lows in five months is the quickest and strongest recovery after a BEAR market low. The comeback rally appears to be the beginning of a new bull market

 

On Friday the Nasdaq hit its 35th new high in 2020 while the S&P recorded its 15th high with a close at 3,397. Both of those indices posted their fourth straight week of gains. The Dow 30 and the Dow Transports were both unchanged on the week, while the small caps as measured by the Russell 2000 fell 1.5%. 

 

This week, concerns over a new coronavirus stimulus bill kept the market’s gains in check as party representatives appeared unable to come to an agreement on the terms of a package. 

 

Washington continues to bicker while markets hit fresh record highs as we experience the strongest start to any month of August in 20 years. 

 

What to make of the haters who are still singing the “too much complacency” / “a total disconnect from the real economy” / “only a handful of stocks are rising” tune?

Our Take
 

Below I will get into why we, as investors, are predisposed to looking out for dangers that may upset our investment plans, but first I want to point out what is being lost in neverending gloom and doom of the popular financial media. 

 

For those who wonder why we are hitting new highs or who fear that the risk-reward is most certainly now skewed to the downside I would recall the following FACTS:

 

-Retail Sales hit a record high last week, and now Housing Starts and Building Permits are back to pre-pandemic levels.

-Airline passenger traffic has continued to improve off its lows from April, and the seven-day average traffic is the strongest since March 22nd.

-Adjusted for seasonal factors, the IHS Markit Flash U.S. Composite PMI Output Index posted 54.7 in August, up from 50.3 at the start of the third quarter, and signaled a strong increase in output (18-month high). Moreover, it marked the sharpest upturn in private sector business activity since February 2019.

-U.S. Services Business Activity Index at 54.8 (50.0 in July). 17-month high.

-U.S. Manufacturing PMI at 53.6 (50.9 in July). 19-month high.

-U.S. Manufacturing Output Index at 53.9 (51.7 in July). 19-month high.

 

Siân Jones, Economist at IHS Markit noted a strong expansion in U.S. private sector output in August:

"August data pointed to a further improvement in business conditions across the private sector as client demand picked up among both manufacturers and service providers. Notably, the renewed increase in sales among service sector firms was welcome news following five months of declines."

"Encouragingly, firms signalled an accelerated rise in hiring, as greater new business inflows led to increased pressure on capacity. Some also mentioned that time taken to establish safe businesses practices had now allowed them to expand their workforce numbers."

"However, expectations regarding output over the coming year dipped slightly from July due to uncertainty stemming from the pandemic and the upcoming election. Meanwhile, cost burdens surged higher amid reports of greater raw material prices. Although manufacturers increased their selling prices at a faster rate to help compensate, service sector firms noted that competitive pressures and discounting to attract customers had stymied their overall pricing power."
 

Furthermore when we move from the macro backdrop to the company level we see similar green shoots: 

-We continue to see extremely strong beat rates, especially for bottom-line EPS numbers. Overall, 82% of companies have reported earnings better than expected with an aggregate earnings surprise of ~22%.

-Forward guidance continues to be as positive as investors have ever seen it, but not many analysts are talking about it. 

 

Today, the haters state that technology stocks are in a new bubble, but the data may suggest otherwise. When compared to other sectors,  the Technology sector easily has the strongest EPS beat rate this season at 87%. Industrials, Consumer Staples, and Materials have the next strongest beat rates, while Energy and Real Estate have the weakest beat rates in the 50s. Do these numbers suggest that the market is irrational?

Screen Shot 2020-08-22 at 4.42.41 PM.png

What of the claim that technology is doing ALL of the heavy lifting and this can’t go on? Is this even accurate? 

 

This may sound hard to believe, but the Technology sector ETF is just the sixth best performing sector in the third quarter and underperforming the S&P 500.

 

Industrials, Consumer Discretionary, Materials, and Communication Services are all posting double-digit percentage gains this quarter. With Consumer staples posting a 9+% gain, that is also higher than the 8.8% gain for the Technology sector in Q3.

 

The S&P is also up 9+% for the quarter. Let's not forget that Small Cap Growth, Small Cap Value, and Mid Cap value are also posting double-digit percentage gains in Q3 as well…

 

What about the general claim that the market is overpriced? The S&P 500 is trading at 10% above its 200-day moving average, similar to where it traded in February and at other previous market highs so there isn’t much new to see here yet what of the claim that the market is overvalued?

 

This appears to be a popular opinion as cash on the sidelines continues to to hit record highs. The double dip narrative appears to be gaining steam with every new fresh record high. Are stocks overvalued? The following tweet offers some insight:

IMG_0919.png

Barry’s tweet is a reminder that classic “quick and dirty” valuation tools such as PE multiple should be relied upon with caution. What “expert” truly has any idea how high the PE multiple should be with an unlimited level of monetary stimulus and backstop of credit from the Fed? What investor has been here before? 

 

At minimum, it isn’t unreasonable to assume that the multiple should NOT be in line with historical norms. Therefore, the overvaluation “models” many investors and classical “value investors” cling to simply cannot hold the same weight they did with the 10-year Treasury at 0.68% when the historical norm is well above 5.0% (see Morgan Housel’s article below on Expiring Skills vs. Permanent Skills).

 

In fact, Kai Wu of Sparkline capital has put together an interesting research report which suggests that classical “value investing” has a long and distinguished pedigree but is currently in a deep thirteen-year drawdown as its “models” have rotated such investors into a massive losing bet against technological disruption
 

This is not the time for dogma. The old playbooks should at minimum be questioned. More than ever before, espousing a flexible approach is required. Inspiration from the old and appreciation for the new is a must as the “New” economy becomes THE economy.  

Membership to Exclusive Daily Newsletter



We have launched an exclusive daily newsletter including actionable daily insights for DIY investors from Logos LP

  • Each Digest Contains the Following:

    • Key Market Technicals

    • Logos LP Watchlist 

    • Macro News

    • Logos LP Update

    • Alerts

Membership will initially be limited to 1000 members. Please subscribe here.

Musings

I recently heard Drake’s new hit single “Laugh Now Cry Later,” on which Drake and Lil Durk rap about the high-life they live hoping to live in the moment and deal with pain and troubles later. As usual, Drake has aptly captured the spirit of the moment at a time when it appears that governments and central banks around the world are engaging in ever increasing monetary and fiscal stimulus that favors immediate pleasure, pushing pain and troubles to some future date for some future generation

 

The deficit spending for the U.S. is over $3 trillion so far this year and for Canada, close to $75 billion. While the costs are clear, the benefits are less so. Financial relief for millions of Americans and Canadians furloughed or unemployed has certainly been a short-term humanitarian gift but what about the future? 

 

As both governments in the USA and Canada look to additional government spending they must acknowledge the fact that monetary and fiscal spending have not generated ​significant growth ​over the past decade

 

As Michael Farr suggests, “our current efforts continue to make the same mistakes.  There are two primary mistakes: one, while surges of liquidity can stave off economic collapse​, and provide needed relief, they have little ability to stimulate ​sustained growth.  When growth doesn’t come, policy makers add more stimulus.  Two, cheap money has increased supply and done little to increase demand.”

 

The injections over the past ten years of QE haven’t created any multiplier effect. A trillion dollar injection results in a one-time trillion dollar surge and another trillion in debt because the U.S. doesn’t have an extra trillion lying around somewhere (the USA hasn’t run a surplus since the 1990s). 

 

Instead, the dollars should be funnelled to things that will grow and create jobs and increase over time. In short, there needs to be a clear ROI on future spending beyond the payment of another month’s rent or mortgage. This is the kind of investment that successful private industry and individuals would make. 

 

Unfortunately, policy makers have chosen to continue on a kind of willfully blind panglossian adventure in which they take the recipients of stimulus to an amusement park only to have them return to their same old same old. While at the park they feel pretty good. They temporarily forget their struggles and pain as they live the highlife only to return out another trillion in cash. When the high fades, a weak business pre-pandemic is still a weak business, a poor/precarious skill set/job is still a poor/precarious skill set/job. 

 

Instead, policy makers will need to have the courage to confront the harsh realities of this “Laugh Now Cry Later” economy. The rapid adoption of remote work and automation is accelerating inequalities which were in place well before the pandemic. The resulting ‘K’ shaped recovery has been and will continue to be good for professionals with the right skills who are largely back to work, with stock portfolios approaching new highs—and bad for everyone else.

 

The stimulus dollars as they are currently being deployed are not addressing this reality. Over the past ten years to today, the economy has no longer been creating steady jobs for low-skilled, low-wage workers as fast as it once was. Things will not go back to the way they were. No amount of protectionism or taxation of the hyper-rich will make it so. 

 

Alternatively, if policy makers are to have a chance at stimulating the kind of sustained growth we need, they will need to acknowledge that not all skills, jobs and businesses are created equal. Certain uses of capital and certain skills have higher ROIs than others. 

 

They will need to be more discerning capital allocators if they wish to stimulate a generation of producers, earners, consumers, tax payers, creative innovators and problem solvers that would better the future for generations to come. 

 

Sadly, looking at the sorry state of the current political discourse, such courage appears to be in short supply. 

 

After all, perhaps given how uncertain the future now looks and how much harder it will be for most to make a buck, many may be satisfied with what they can get. Even if it’s just a free trip to Wonderland…

Charts of the Month

Screen Shot 2020-08-22 at 7.31.10 PM.png

After slowing to a trickle in March, public listings roared back and are now on pace to reach their highest levels since the peak of the dot-com boom in 2000.

IMG_6243.PNG

Robot subsidy: Payroll and related taxes have held steady over the past 40 years, but the effective tax rate on automation has fallen. Translation: Economists argue we are now subsidizing the replacement of humans with robots, even when robots aren't as productive.  

Logos LP July 2020 Performance

 
July 2020 Return: 4.77%
 

2020 YTD (July) Return: 51.44%
 

Trailing Twelve Month Return: 59.30%
 

Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) since inception March 26, 2014: +21.91%
 

Thought of the Month

"The worst loneliness is to not be comfortable with yourself. Mark Twain



Articles and Ideas of Interest

 

  • After tapping the bond market at a record-shattering pace in recent months, Corporate America is more indebted today than ever beforeAnd while much of that fresh cash -- more than $1.6 trillion in total -- helped scores of companies stay afloat during the pandemic lockdown, it now threatens to curb an economic recovery that was already showing signs of sputtering. Many companies will have to divert even more cash to repaying these obligations at the same time that their profits sink, leaving them with less to spend on expanding payrolls or upgrading facilities in months ahead. Leverage ratios have never been higher for U.S. companies.

  • Scientists discover a major lasting benefit of growing up outside the city. As the recession is predicted to slam cities and many rush to leave them, the data seems to support the move. Using data from 3,585 people collected across four cities in Europe, scientists from the Barcelona Institute for Global Health (also called IS Global) report a strong relationship between growing up away from the natural world and mental health in adulthood. Overall, they found a strong correlation between low exposure to nature during childhood and higher levels of of nervousness and feelings of depression in adulthood. Co-author Mark Nieuwenhuijsen, Ph.D., director of IS Global’s urban planning, environment and health initiative, tells Inverse that the relationship between nature and mental health remained strong, even when he adjusted for confounding factors.

  • Delisting Chinese Firms: A cure likely worse than the disease. Interesting article by Jesse Friend suggesting that if the proposed legislation becomes law, its cure could be worse than the disease. Both Chinese controlling shareholders and the Chinese government are likely to exploit such a trading ban to further their own objectives, at the expense of Americans holding shares in these firms.

  • The unstoppable Damian Lillard is the NBA superstar we deserve. He’s lifted his game to new heights inside the NBA bubble, but what sets the Trail Blazers’ point guard apart is the fierce loyalty and outsider spirit that’s driven him from the start. His unwillingness to run from “the Grind” is an inspiration.

  • The unravelling of America. Interesting perspective (albeit a bit depressing) on America by anthropologist Wade Davis in the Rolling Stone in which he suggests that COVID has reduced to tatters the illusion of American exceptionalism. At the height of the crisis, with more than 2,000 dying each day, Americans found themselves members of a failed state, ruled by a dysfunctional and incompetent government largely responsible for death rates that added a tragic coda to America’s claim to supremacy in the world. Using compelling data and the historical context of other great empires, he paints a picture of a country in decline. Nothing lasts forever - perhaps America’s best days are behind it?

  • Expiring vs. Permanent Skills.  Morgan Housel knocks it out of the park with this one in which he explains that every field has two kinds of skills: Expiring skills, which are vital at a given time but prone to diminishing as technology improves and a field evolves. Permanent skills, which were as essential 100 years ago as they are today, and will still be 100 years from now. Both are important. But they’re treated differently. Expiring skills tend to get more attention. They’re more likely to be the cool new thing, and a key driver of an industry’s short-term performance. They’re what employers value and employees flaunt. Permanent skills are different. They’ve been around a long time, which makes them look stale and basic. They can be hard to define and quantify, which gives the impression of fortune-cookie wisdom vs. a hard skill. But permanent skills compound over time, which gives them quiet importance. Morgan provides an excellent list of certain key permanent skills applicable to many fields.

Our best wishes for a month filled with discovery and contentment,

Logos LP

All These Worries

sheldon-thompson-CXET9y0BmkE-unsplash.jpg

Good Morning,
 

Stocks rose Friday as news about a potential coronavirus treatment increased hope for an economic recovery following the outbreak. Tech stocks also continued their hot streak.

 

Gilead Sciences said its coronavirus treatment candidate, Remdesivir, showed an improvement in clinical recovery and a 62% reduction in the risk of mortality compared with standard care. The news sent Gilead shares up more than 2%. BioNTech’s CEO also told The Wall Street Journal the company’s coronavirus vaccine candidate could be ready for approval by December.

 

Shares of companies that would benefit from the economy reopening outperformed, especially the Russel 2000.



Our Take


In the short term, several of our proprietary technical indicators suggest that the market has become over-extended (especially sentiment in the NASDAQ) and thus we would not be surprised if markets pulled back as earnings season kicks off next week. However, if history is any guide, we do think that any selloff or pullback would likely be an opportunity to increase equity exposure. 

 

Looking at the second half of 2020, we won’t regurgitate the popular suggestions that the market has run too far, too fast, or that too many people own too few of the same “darling” technology stocks which COVID-19 has exposed as defensive investments/the new utilities (more on this below). These points are becoming so frequently argued that they could be considered to be the “consensus” view.

 

The same can be said for all the gloom and doom reasons which were presented in March and continue to be presented as arguments in favor of why one should be underweight equities or out of the market altogether. There are plenty of things to worry about, but these worries may be priced in as it should be stressed that in general, investors, large and small, are still in a high state of anxiety significantly underweight equities as sentiment levels remain at or near historic lows.

 

Alternatively, the more interesting story in our opinion is that interest rates are incredibly low and likely to remain so for a very long time in our low productivity/low growth world. This environment creates challenges for the trillions of dollars, institutional and otherwise, that have to be invested for one reason or another.

 

As such, if the economy continues to recover, COVID-19 cases and deaths trend in the right direction, and we get more positive vaccine/treatment news, the market is likely to continue its hot streak as cash comes off the sidelines and large institutions attempt to reach their historical median equity exposure.

 

Despite such predictions, as we hit the midpoint of 2020, we can notice that the cost of bad market timing decisions this year has been annihilation. As Vildana Hajric for Bloomberg so eloquently reminds us

 

"But for all the dizzying turbulence, it’s worth noting that the S&P 500 is nearly flat for anyone who sat tight and held through the chaos. Mistakes stand out in an environment like that -- the back-breaking costs of even a few wrong moves in a market as turbulent as this one. Maybe volatility is the time for active managers to shine, but the downside of getting it wrong has rarely been greater.

 

One stark statistic highlighting the risk focuses on the penalty an investor incurs by sitting out the biggest single-day gains. Without the best five, for instance, a tepid 2020 becomes a horrendous one: a loss of 30%."

 

Another gem from Aswath Damodaran, an expert on valuation at New York University’s Stern School of Business:

 

"The people who hate the rally are the people who are market gurus, because it makes it seem like their expertise is useless. And guess what? It is useless,” says Aswath Damodaran, an expert on valuation at New York University’s Stern School of Business. “Those people exist to make soothsayers look good.”

 

Such statistics remind us of the danger of trying to call the market’s peak, something that investors are feeling tempted to do again now with the S&P 500, DOW and NASDAQ fresh off significant rebounds, coronavirus infections rising and the worst earnings season in a decade about to kick off. Bearishness and general market timing as a strategy has a cost and 2020 is no exception to such a rule as over the long run stocks tend to go up. 

 

In a recent survey conducted by Citigroup, more than two-thirds of investors see a 20% decline in the market as more likely than a gain of a similar amount. Is the consensus view really destined to get it right as the second half of 2020 begins? Or will “staying the course” again deliver the best investment outcomes? 



Membership to Exclusive Daily Newsletter



We have launched an exclusive daily newsletter including actionable daily insights for DIY investors from Logos LP

  • Each Digest Contains the Following:

    • Key Market Technicals

    • Logos LP Watchlist Technicals

    • Macro News

    • Logos LP Update

    • Alerts

Membership will initially be limited to 1000 members. Please subscribe here.

Musings
 

When thinking about the real economy and the stock market of late - whether reading about them, observing them, or listening to friends and clients talk about their experiences - it becomes clear that there is still a lot of uncertainty and anxiety surrounding what the future holds. 

 

Will the recovery be a V, an L, a W or perhaps some other letter? Will certain industries be forever impaired or worse, collapse? What will all of these newly unemployed people do if their old jobs never come back? 

 

I read a few paragraphs on these topics in the Washington Post the other day. The author was skeptical of the V shaped narrative:

 

United airlines announced plans to lay off more than one-third of its 95,000 workers. Brooks Brothers, which first opened for business in 1818, filed for bankruptcy. And Bed Bath and Beyond said it will close 200 stores. 

 

Welcome to the recovery. 
 

If there were still hopes of a “V-shaped” comeback from the novel coronavirus shutdown, this past week should have put an end to them. The pandemic shock, which economists once assumed would only be a temporary business interruption, appears instead to be settling into a traditional, self-perpetuating recession. 

 

One thing we can say with relative confidence as penned in the New York Times by David Leonhardt is that: 

 

the course of the virus itself will play the biggest role in the medium term. If scientific breakthroughs come quickly and the virus is largely defeated this year, there may not be many permanent changes to everyday life. On the other hand, if a vaccine remains out of reach for years, the long-term changes could be truly profound. Any industry that depends on close human contact would be at risk.

 

Large swaths of the cruise-ship and theme-park industries might go away. So could many movie theaters and minor-league baseball teams. The long-predicted demise of the traditional department store would finally come to pass. Thousands of restaurants would be wiped out (even if they would eventually be replaced by different restaurants).

 

What is lost in much of the commentary about the recovery’s shape/trajectory is that when the economy weakens, poor companies with flawed business models and/or products/services that consumers and businesses can live without and/or easily replicate, are always those that will suffer the most, if not die. 

 

Downturns are opportunities to revisit inefficiencies and can be healthy as they are part of the “creative destruction” process that economist Joseph Schumpeter famously described, allowing more efficient and innovative companies to rise. 

 

What is also lost in the commentary is that although we find ourselves in the middle of this process of creative destruction, the novel coronavirus shutdown induced recession did not begin the forces of change. It merely accelerated trends that had been blessed by the capital markets long before the pain began. 

 

In a fascinating article in a recent issue of the Economist the author cites research that the risk-adjusted returns of a high-resilience portfolio of stocks (mostly technology companies offering highly differentiated products and services that consumers and businesses simply can’t live without) were roughly 25% higher than a low-resilience portfolio of stocks (mostly cyclical companies offering non-differentiated products and services that consumers and businesses can live without and/or easily replicate) during the same period this year. 

 

The authors of the above research extend their analysis back in time and come to the rather striking conclusion that the outperformance of less vulnerable firms predates the pandemic. They detect that returns began steadily diverging in 2014, before widening further in the second half of 2019, and then exploding early this year.

 

This does not imply that markets foresaw the pandemic. It is owed, in part, to a boom in the price of technology stocks. Yet it helps illustrate why much of the reallocation now under way is very likely to stick- because it represents a continuation of trends that were long blessed by capital markets.” 

 

As such, there will likely be no turning back. No return to the pre-covid economy. Research has shown that roughly 42% of lay-offs linked to the pandemic are likely to prove permanent while options prices imply that over the next two years investors require a far higher expected return in order to accept exposure to vulnerable firms than more resilient ones. 

 

As such firms, investors, workers and perhaps most of all, politicians will have hard choices to make of whether or not to keep struggling companies, jobs and skill sets afloat. 

Each stakeholder above will need to rethink their operations, trim fat that was accumulated while the economy was growing and reallocate resources more nimbly and creatively towards skills, pursuits and innovation more suited to the future. 

Politicians should be more honest with their citizens about the power of these structural economic changes as they try and strike a delicate balance between generous support (which can discourage workers and firms from seeking new jobs and opportunities in expanding sectors) vs. too little support for those workers and firms dislocated by these changes (which can cause greater inequality and thus even greater social unrest and a prolonged slump). 

In this new paradigm, humility, flexibility and a growth mindset will separate those who thrive from those that merely survive. 

The future rewards those who press on. I don’t have time to feel sorry for myself. I don’t have time to complain. I’m going to press on.” -Barack Obama 

Charts of the Month

Screen Shot 2020-07-12 at 10.00.10 AM.png
Screen Shot 2020-07-12 at 10.00.24 AM.png
Screen Shot 2020-07-12 at 10.00.45 AM.png

Chart courtesy of Worldometer - Coronavirus

Screen Shot 2020-07-11 at 6.41.38 PM.png

Logos LP June 2020 Performance
 


June 2020 Return: 11.78%
 

2020 YTD (June) Return: 44.54%
 

Trailing Twelve Month Return: 58.81%
 

Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) since inception March 26, 2014: +21.34%


 

Thought of the Month


 

"When I look back on all these worries, I remember the story of the old man who said on his deathbed that he had had a lot of trouble in his life, most of which had never happened.” – Winston Churchill




Articles and Ideas of Interest

 

  • Are tech stocks the new utilities for investors? Tech stocks weren’t considered defensive investments in the past. But as the coronavirus crisis reinforces technology’s fundamental role in our lives, investors can find sources of risk reduction and growth potential in companies that have become digital utilities enabling global networks.

  • Over the past 60 years, more spending on police hasn’t necessarily meant less crime. If we look at how spending has changed relative to crime in each year since 1960, comparing spending in 2018 dollars per person to crime rates, we see that there is no correlation between the two. More spending in a year hasn’t significantly correlated to less crime or to more crime. For violent crime, in fact, the correlation between changes in crime rates and spending per person in 2018 dollars is almost zero.

 

  • A mathematician calculated how to keep fans safe at Yankee Stadium. Based on social distancing guidelines, only 11% of seats should be filled.

  • 2020's top 15 market moments according to Business Insider, from COVID-19 crashes to huge rallies. At the start of 2020, the killing of Qassam Soleimani, and the Iranian-US tensions that followed, was the biggest story in town for markets. But COVID-19 soon began to spread across the world, causing markets to tank. It's been a rollercoaster ride ever since. From oil prices turning negative in April to famed investor Warren Buffett selling his airline stocks in May, here are the top 15 market events of 2020 so far.  

  • Active fund managers trail the S&P 500 for the ninth year in a row. After 10 years, 85 percent of large cap funds underperformed the S&P 500, and after 15 years, nearly 92 percent are trailing the index.

  • We’re not likely to have a Covid-19 vaccine anytime soon. In the meantime, two scientists have developed an antibody-based shot that provides a similar level of protection. A growing number of doctors, including Anthony Fauci, think the approach is promising and readily scalable. So why do US officials and pharmaceutical companies keep refusing to mass-produce it? Emily Baumgaertner takes a look in the Los Angeles Times.

     

  • A buy everything rally beckons in a world of yield curve control. Should yield curve control go global, it would cement markets’ perception of central banks as the buyers of last resort, boosting risk appetite, lowering volatility and intensifying a broader hunt for yield. While money managers caution that such an environment could fuel reckless investment already stoked by a flood of fiscal and monetary stimulus, they nonetheless see benefits rippling across credit, equities, gold and emerging markets

  • Like a ton of bricks - Is investors’ love affair with commercial property ending? Covid-19 has upended the impression of solidity. Most immediately, it has severely impaired tenants’ ability to pay rent. It also raises questions about where shopping, work or leisure will happen once the crisis abates. Both are likely to prompt investors to become more discriminating. Some institutions may shift funds away from riskier properties; other investors, meanwhile will hunt for bargains, or seek to repurpose unfashionable stock. As it turns out, more and more people think we can work from home, and should continue to do so. For a nation long frustrated with offices, the coronavirus offers an excellent excuse to avoid them. According to McKinsey, 69% of people who now work from home are equally or more productive than they were at the office. 60% — three in five — say they would prefer to stay home — even after the pandemic is over. Guy Vardi digs into the future of work.

  • Where did my ambition go? A drive to succeed has become a drive to just get by. Why workplace ambition is flickering out in this endless limbo. Maris Kreizman writes that the tectonic shift currently shaking our culture/society feels profound. In a time when the pandemic has caused so much uncertainty about the future of so many industries, professional ambition begins to feel like misplaced energy, as helpful to achieving success as chronic anxiety. This is fascinating in light of Robert Shiller’s recent suggestion that the psychological toll from the coronavirus pandemic could completely reshape our societies. He warns that the big risk is people start thinking the setback will last forever and it impacts their willingness to take risks. That mindset could turn into a self-fulfilling prophecy, dramatically hurt demand and push more businesses to the brink. “We don’t have to keep up with the Joneses anymore,” said Shiller. “That might create a different kind of culture that would last for years that you don’t have to show the latest fashions and drive a spanking new car. We just learn that you can relax. But that is bad for the economy.”

  • The end of tourism? The pandemic has devastated global tourism, and many will say ‘good riddance’ to overcrowded cities and rubbish-strewn natural wonders. Christopher de Bellaigue asks if there is any way to reinvent an industry that does so much damage?

Our best wishes for a month filled with discovery and contentment,

Logos LP

The Beauty of Discomfort

anthony-delanoix-urUdKCxsTUI-unsplash.jpg

Good Morning,
 

Stocks rallied on Friday after an unexpected surge in U.S. jobs raised hope that the economy is starting to recover from the government imposed lockdown. 

 

The Nasdaq Composite became the first of the three major averages to climb back to an all-time high, advancing 2.0%. After tumbling as much as 25% earlier this year, the tech-heavy index is now 9.3% higher for 2020.

 

Friday’s rally put the S&P 500 down just 1.1% for 2020. At one point this year, the broader market index was down 30.3%. The Dow was only down 5.0% year to date after dropping as much as 34.6% in 2020.

 

Friday’s gains put the S&P 500 up more than 45% from a March 23 intraday low and less than 6% from its February 19 record.

 

U.S. employers added a shocking 2.5 million jobs last month — the largest gain on record — while the unemployment rate slid to 13.3%, the Labor Department said Friday. Economists polled by Dow Jones expected a drop of more than 8 million jobs and the unemployment rate to nearly reach 20%, which would have been the highest since the 1930s.



Our Take

 

All of a sudden, the V-shaped recovery thesis is looking pretty convincing. Friday’s report appears to support the beginning of the labor market recovery and the unemployment rate is likely to fall further in June. 

 

Quite frankly, it is astonishing just how wrong the “experts” got it (despite reports that a “misclassification error” made the unemployment rate look better than it is). Average expectations of more than 8 million jobs lost and instead, the largest amount of jobs created in any month EVER at 2.5 million. Friday’s nonfarm payrolls report is quite likely the biggest surprise relative to expectations that the market has EVER seen.

 

This is game changing and represents a completely different picture than the job market ravaged by the government mandated shutdown. 

 

Jeff Cox puts forth a convincing description of the turnaround as a “three-headed” bull:

 

"First, government funding helped mitigate a wave of layoffs that otherwise would have come with stay-at-home orders related to the coronavirus. Then, states and cities reopened more quickly than anticipated. Finally, the U.S. economy, which seemed to wobble even before the shutdown, showed an uncanny sense of resilience that gave still another boost to an uncanny Wall Street rally that seemed to defy fundamentals.”

 

Was this data surprise a completely unexpected outcome? Not really. The stock market has been telling us that the U.S. was rebounding more quickly from the pandemic than anyone expected. But instead of being optimistic and listening to the market, many decried “the gap between Wall Street and Main Street,” and focused instead on the gloomy forecasts about how much of this job loss researchers think will be permanent and how we’re already in another Great Depression.  

 

Time will tell as there is still a lot of work to be done. Job gains represent just a fraction of those lost, yet American balance sheets are also looking healthy. The personal savings rate hit a historic 33% in April. This rate - which indicates how much people save as a percentage of their disposable income - is by far the highest since the department started tracking in the 1960s. 

 

The swiftness and severity of a U.S. economic recovery hinges on whether consumers continue to stockpile cash or start to spend again. Our thought is that a 2 month recession shouldn't be enough to scare consumers into keeping their wallets shut. We see pent up “revenge” spending to be likely, and already see signs of this given the incredible velocity of retail investor buying in the financial markets. 

 

Kelly Evans reminds us that “after all, guess who has been buying this market since the darkest days of the pandemic? Retail investors. The general public. Here’s Axios, on March 30: “As traders around the globe have frantically unloaded positions in recent weeks, so-called mom and pop retail investors have kept level heads and not sold out of stocks.” “Wall Street” was panicking and selling the rally. Everyday Americans were buying.” 

 

We aren’t out of the woods yet and thus, taking victory laps around the bears is certainly premature. Nevertheless, this incredible rally, which is gradually being confirmed by the economic data, should remind us to listen to “experts” with a healthy degree of scepticism. 


As Nick Maggiulli has recently stated: “No one has a monopoly on knowledge. No one is infallible. Not the analysts at the top tier banks. Not the Nobel Laureates. Not even the great Warren Buffett. Yet, we create this mythology around them that says otherwise...the divide between you and them is smaller than you think.”

Screen Shot 2020-06-06 at 6.13.41 PM.png

With each passing day, the March lows appear to have in fact been a “historic” buying opportunity. What the market appears to be reminding us dovetails Ramp’s statement above quite nicely which is to remain flexible in our convictions and to do our own homework. To remember that our desire to be right should never trump our goal of generating investment returns. We won’t be right 100% of the time, but with a flexible data driven approach and a clear investment strategy, ANYONE has a shot at generating market beating returns over time.


Stock Ideas



Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (KC): China's largest independent cloud provider and 3rd largest cloud service. The Company saw 64% Q1 growth YoY and guided 60-65% growth for FY 20. Expected growth for next year is 60%. Currently, they are building and running data centres for phase 1 "land and grab" in China's enterprise cloud market, which grew from 2% IT penetration in 2015 to 15% for 2020. Billings have been growing at 115% CAGR and will continue at a high clip given the early stage of China's cloud market (~30% market growth, 3-4x the size of the US market). Competition from AliBaba and Tencent will remain and new players will eventually enter the market. However, the main drivers for Kingsoft include: 1. Neutrality for video and gaming; 2. Data risk management for the enterprise in key verticals like healthcare and financial services; and 3. Product innovation and development of scalable solutions for enterprise IT needs. At 3.8x next year's revenues, we think that the valuation is very reasonable given the company's future cash flows and we expect gross margins to ramp up over the next decade.

 

Membership to Exclusive Daily Newsletter


We have launched an exclusive daily newsletter including actionable daily insights from Logos LP

  • Each Digest Contains the Following:

    • Key Market Technicals

    • Logos LP Watchlist Technicals

    • Macro News

    • Logos LP Update

    • Alerts

    • Access to the Logos LP team

Membership will initially be limited to 1000 members. Please subscribe here.



Musings

 

To say that 2020 has been a challenge would be an understatement. COVID-19’s tragic loss of life, government imposed lockdowns, natural disasters, economic pain, market turmoil, trade wars, divisive rhetoric, the failure of expertise, unparalleled uncertainty and now, civil unrest. For even the most disciplined stoic, 2020 has been a year of discomfort. 

 

Nevertheless, 2020 can be viewed differently. It can be viewed as an opportunity to observe and be reminded how beautiful discomfort can be.

 

How so? Well as a starting point, humans are wired to seek comfort. As babies, we cry when we are hungry, lonely, bored and uncomfortable, signalling our distress. Our parents then cater to us to alleviate our discomfort. As we grow into children, the pattern continues. Our parents protect us from turmoil at school or on the playground and in organized sports the objective becomes to make children feel as comfortable as possible. Participation is rewarded and competition and outperformance is frowned upon. Standout talent is chastised and even penalized for superiority for fear of its effects on those less gifted. 

 

Moving on to high school and university, our teachers and parents continue to be wary of exposing us to any discomfort. Materials are censored as it may upset certain students, provocative statements and debates are avoided, grades are manipulated to avoid disappointment and all matters of tardiness are excused. 

 

As Amanda Lang in her book The Beauty of Discomfort has observed: schools are now working so hard to avoid giving offence that they cannot teach one of the most important lessons of young adulthood: how not to take offence. Learning to cope with discomfort, disagreement, aggression and criticism (even wholly unprovoked aggression and criticism) can be one of the greatest accomplishments of a child’s early school years.

 

Why should we be concerned about the proliferation of this “discomfort avoidance” trend in our societies? 

 

People who get comfortable occupying the discomfort zone learn that the habit of making an effort as well as the willingness to make mistakes is the price for positive change, growth and ultimately, success (however you define it). 

 

In contrast, watching the events of 2020 unfold appears to suggest that our culture of “discomfort avoidance” may be failing us. 

 

Observing the 2020 fallout puts into perspective the reasons why some people drive change while others are blindsided by it. Why are some able to adapt and thrive when change is forced upon them while others stay stuck in the mud or are run over by it?

 

The variance in outcomes can be better understood when discomfort is reframed as beautiful. Change isn't comfortable, yet those who can change and thereby innovate, have the best chance of succeeding. Studies show time and time again, that successful people are those that don’t merely tolerate discomfort, they embrace it. It is their comfort with discomfort that makes them so good at change. 

 

Discomfort is conceptualized as a positive catalyst rather than a negative. Thus, if we look at 2020 through this lens, we can look at it as an incredible opportunity to lead us to positive change and growth. Yet to change something as large as a country, or its institutions, we need to start by changing ourselves and the way we each experience discomfort. 

 

At present, it would appear that the discomforts of 2020 have brought us to a crossroads. It is a potential turning point in the way we as individuals and as a society, experience discomfort. 

 

We can either continue down the path that we appear to be on - one which views discomfort as something to be avoided at all costs, ultimately leading to self-defeating and self-destructive behaviour (i.e. seeking instant gratification, ascribing blame to others, holding tightly to old convictions, avoiding truth, avoiding personal responsibility, shaming, envy, violence and destruction) - or we can choose to view discomfort as something to be confronted, studied and used to push us towards positive change and growth. 

 

What approach to the discomfort of 2020 will we choose? The future of our society may depend on the answer. Will we look to its beauty or continue to view it as a beast? As much as we may want to defer that choice to someone else, the decision ultimately lies nowhere else but within each and every one of us…

 

Charts of the Month

Screen Shot 2020-06-06 at 2.44.45 PM.png

Looking six months out after strong 50-day rallies, the S&P 500 was positive 100% of the time and on average returned 10.2%.


Screen Shot 2020-06-06 at 3.03.57 PM.png

Frothy FOMO?

Screen Shot 2020-06-06 at 3.43.46 PM.png

Zombieland

Logos LP May 2020 Performance
 


May 2020 Return: 23.93%
 

2020 YTD (May) Return: 29.31%
 

Trailing Twelve Month Return: 49.99%
 

Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) since inception March 26, 2014: +19.49%


 

Thought of the Month


 

"I will eliminate hatred, envy, jealousy, selfishness, and cynicism, by developing love for all humanity, because I know that a negative attitude toward others can never bring me success. I will cause others to believe in me, because I will believe in them, and in myself.” ― Napoleon Hill




Articles and Ideas of Interest

 

  • The “Inconvenient Fact” behind private equity outperformance. After fees, investors in private equity funds earn exactly what they would have in public stocks, according to new research. But the high fees have not only created a new billionaire class, they’re squeezing private equity-backed companies for unrealistic growth.

  • Smart money is uneasy. Hedge funds are gearing up for another downturn in the stock market after growing uneasy that surging prices do not reflect the economic problems ahead, but many are apprehensive about going short. Meanwhile two-thirds of US executives surveyed expect the American economy will recover from the recession within one year, according to a survey of 300 decision makers conducted by TMF Group that was shared exclusively with CNN Business. Furthermore sentiment gauges suggest investors have no conviction in the stock market. 

 

  • Do reparations make sense? The idea of reparations for slavery has become morally appealing of late. What should we make of it? David Brooks for the NYT suggests it is the right way to proceed. David Frum for the Atlantic suggests that it is an impossibility.  

  • Millennials are facing the worst economic odds in history. It’s worse for women. Their uncertain future is now defined not by dreams but by getting by. Very interesting article outlining the situation using real world examples. As such millennials could cause the next housing slump as housing slips out of their grasp.

     

  • How fear, groupthink drove unnecessary global lockdowns. Yinon Weiss for Real Clear Politics suggests that in the face of a novel virus threat, China clamped down on its citizens and  academics used faulty information to build faulty models. Leaders relied on these faulty models. Dissenting views were suppressed. The media flamed fears and the world panicked. That is the story of what may eventually be known as one of the biggest medical and economic blunders of all time. The collective failure of every Western nation, except one, to question groupthink will surely be studied by economists, doctors, and psychologists for decades to come. To put things in perspective, the virus is now known to have an infection fatality rate for most people under 65 that is no more dangerous than driving 13 to 101 miles per day. Even by conservative estimates, the odds of COVID-19 death are roughly in line with existing baseline odds of dying in any given year.

  • Why are we really in lockdown? Jemima Kelly for the Financial Times suggests that the real reason we are in lockdown is moral: “If we can’t actually care for the people dying in front of us, there’s a sense in which the value of human life, or human relations, is ignored and trampled upon. If you can’t care for the people in front of you, you wonder what the meaning of any of this is.”

     

  • This decade belonged to China. So will the next one. Martin Jacques for the Guardian suggests that the West is finding it extraordinarily difficult to come to terms with China’s remarkable ascent. The next decade will see a continuing fragmentation of the western-centric international system, together with the growing influence of Chinese-oriented institutions. The process will be uneven, unpredictable and, at times, fraught – but ultimately irresistible. Rise to the challenge or buy stock in the incumbent’s best companies…

     

  • Just say no to angel Investing. Great article by Financial Samurai illustrating the pitfalls of angel investing.

  • Human evolution is still happening - possibly faster than ever. Natural selection isn’t the only factor deciding human evolution.

All the best for a month filled with joy and gratitude,  


Logos LP